Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 12:09 pm
Tim / Jensen
I'm wondering if this issue has something to do with the copper plating on the rods? It could be making the steel a sacrificial part, corrosion-wise. The opposite of zinc galvanic protection. My big end pins look a lot better than the inside of the rod on the same bearing.....
Rolling contact fatigue happens when cracks grow faster than the surface wear rate rubs them away and then lubricant is forced into the cracks eventually causing bits to fall away from the surface. I have seen rods that have suffered from this. http://www2.mae.ufl.edu/arakere/docs/RCF_JOT.pdf
Mild corrosion is less of a problem, I think. I have read a lot of stuff on rolling contact fatigue in railroad rails. Not exactly motorcycle crankshafts but the science is similar..... :-)
G
I'm wondering if this issue has something to do with the copper plating on the rods? It could be making the steel a sacrificial part, corrosion-wise. The opposite of zinc galvanic protection. My big end pins look a lot better than the inside of the rod on the same bearing.....
Rolling contact fatigue happens when cracks grow faster than the surface wear rate rubs them away and then lubricant is forced into the cracks eventually causing bits to fall away from the surface. I have seen rods that have suffered from this. http://www2.mae.ufl.edu/arakere/docs/RCF_JOT.pdf
Mild corrosion is less of a problem, I think. I have read a lot of stuff on rolling contact fatigue in railroad rails. Not exactly motorcycle crankshafts but the science is similar..... :-)
G
Tim Miller wrote:
Rust pitting is a problem I have witnessed as well. It took about 30 dismantled cranks to have enough good parts for 10 cranks. Rods and cages were scrapped the most.
Tim









