honda305 Home honda305 Auctions honda305 Gallery honda305 Forum


honda305.com Forum

Login
□ Search
□ FAQ 
□ 
Vintage Honda Owners,
Restorers, Riders and
Admirers

Recommendations for CB77 Seat Needed

DJM
honda305.com Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 1:54 pm
Location: Chesterfield UK

CB77 Seat

Post by DJM » Thu Mar 29, 2018 5:04 pm

I'd guess that the reason you've had no response to this is because nobody can confidently give you a definitive answer, certainly I can't.
Here in the UK I think Honda UK had big stocks of unsold bikes and we didn't see that many with the alloy forks, I don't recall ever seeing one with the hunped seat that wasn't a later import from the U.S. I don't think we saw the folding footrests either.

If you can't find out for sure which seat is / was correct for your particular bike, why worry? Just fit the seat you have or the one YOU prefer, it's your bike and your choice.

User avatar
Seadog
honda305.com Member
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2014 9:54 am
Location: Cape Cod, MA

Post by Seadog » Thu Mar 29, 2018 5:45 pm

Thank you, DJM, your insight is helpful.

If there actually was a definitive answer somewhere, I would have found it. I know there isn’t, so I’ve asked for opinions. Hopefully, those would be based on the experiences of those owning ‘66 models or with more knowledge of them and the seat design change than I possess. The bike came to me without a seat and I have no real preference for either of the two designs. I like them both and either would work fine for me. I only want to restore the correct part.

Tim Miller
honda305.com Member
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 6:22 pm
Location: Pflugerville, TX

Post by Tim Miller » Thu Mar 29, 2018 6:29 pm

Silver’s info says the “670A” hump seat was adopted at CB77-1034092.
For whatever that’s worth to you.

Tim

User avatar
Seadog
honda305.com Member
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2014 9:54 am
Location: Cape Cod, MA

Post by Seadog » Thu Mar 29, 2018 6:55 pm

Thanks, Tim. I’ve sent you a PM.
Tim Miller wrote:Silver’s info says the “670A” hump seat was adopted at CB77-1034092.
For whatever that’s worth to you.

Tim

AlanW
honda305.com Member
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 6:33 am
Location: Wirral UK.

Post by AlanW » Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:42 am

High Seadog,
I have a 1966 cb72 and the seat base is about 2" longer and 1" wider than the earlier ones.
A friend of mine had a 1967 cb72 with the same long seat no hump. they have the same brackets as earlier ones and are interchangeable, the later one gives more bum room for the pillion passenger.
Al.

User avatar
Seadog
honda305.com Member
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2014 9:54 am
Location: Cape Cod, MA

Post by Seadog » Fri Mar 30, 2018 7:05 am

Thanks Al. Interesting, I’d never heard of that seat before. Post a photo sometime, if you have a chance.
AlanW wrote:High Seadog,
I have a 1966 cb72 and the seat base is about 2" longer and 1" wider than the earlier ones.
A friend of mine had a 1967 cb72 with the same long seat no hump. they have the same brackets as earlier ones and are interchangeable, the later one gives more bum room for the pillion passenger.
Al.

DJM
honda305.com Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 1:54 pm
Location: Chesterfield UK

CB77 seats

Post by DJM » Fri Mar 30, 2018 7:57 am

I have one of those wider, longer seats fitted to my 64 CB77. I know it isn't the correct one for that year but being bit wider (and I suspect with deeper foam) I find it more comfortable for my aging backside which is also about two inches, at least, wider than my 1964 version.

I aslo have a correct early seat which only needs a bit of restoration work and this is on my (lengthy) to do list. I would probably only fit this 'correct' seat for a 'show' event and as mine isn't a 'show' bike haven't got round to it yet.

Here in the UK this version of the seat is sometimes referred to as the 'violin case' seat because of its shape.

Post Reply




 

CB-77 | CYP-77 | Road Test | Riding Log | Literature | Zen | Marketplace | VJ Survey | Links | Home